Thursday, November 24, 2005

How 'Desperate' can you be?

Has anyone been watching that much-hailed soap, Desperate Housewives? It's pretty unmissable - Star World repeats the same episode about thrice every week, such is its popularity (
Desperate Housewives', that is, not Star World's). I've been watching it more or less regularly, actually, since the day, around 3 months or so back, when Simi Garewal stared me soulfully in the eye during a commercial break and asked me which one of these women was me (or should that be I?). I had to find out- as also figure out why this show is so popular.

So. Am I the wimpy, weepy Susan, whose only role seems to be running after a particular murderer-turned-plumber in the belief that said man was just a very hot plumber and then calling the relationship off when his murdering tendencies became known, going all to pieces and having to be looked after by her extremely sensible 14-year-old daughter, all with this save-me-I'm-vulnerable expression on her face? Or am I the obssessive compulsive Bree, who is so immersed in religion, patriarchy, motherhood, and all things known as 'traditional values' that she (however unwillingly) agrees to participate in her husband's s/m fantasies even after husband has been caught cheating on her and treating her pretty shabbily? Or perhaps the harried Lynette, who decided to give up her career and life so she could look after her husband's home and give birth to his four children, and then live to regret that decision? Or maybe Gabrielle, the rich, spoilt, materialistic, fairly slutty
(forgive me for using this term) ex-model, who ostensibly hankers for her husband's love and attention, but is actually far more distraught when faced with the prospect of losing his fortune?

The answer is: none of the above.

So why do I keep watching this show, then? Partly because there's quite an intriguing mystery happening in the periphery of the show - there's this evil, evil man who's a cold-blooded murderer and is messing with his son's head, and I do want to know how things turn out for him. And partly - I don't know. Maybe I'm sticking around to see if I can find some meaning somewhere, though I doubt it. I mean - by exposing the very hollow and shallow life of middle-class American suburbia, and questioning the notion that marriage and motherhood are the greatest achievements any woman can aspire for if she needs to feel 'fulfilled', the show could be called a critique of the middle-class values that most people take so much for granted. But is it, really? Susan was dumped by her husband who traded her for that cliche, his young blonde secretary, but all she can do once she decides to move on, is chase the first available man so she can repeat her history.

Lynette bitches and complains, but does nothing to improve her situation, Gabrielle's answer to every problem is sleeping with an underaged boy, and Bree would rather stay in her dysfunctional family than live what would definitely be a far healthier life on her own. They all return to the same trap that makes them so unhappy - and, at least according to the creators of the show, there apparently is no alternative in this cosy heterosexual paradise. And why the hell do none of these women work? Why is 'career' such a dirty word?

And why do I keep watching this show that I just trashed? (Actually, a lot about it bewilders me, so be warned - there will be more on Desperate Housewives in later blogs.)

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

I figure you have to be really desperate to watch Despo Housewives :-P

Everyone I know is hooked on it, yet I've managed to sit through just 15 minutes! Why, oh WHY, must I be deprived of understanding what's so fascinating about it?!

Or maybe I'm just nuts! I spend my free time regulating the lives of my Sims, for heaven's sake!

A very cool cat said...

Or, Payal, maybe you're the only sensible one among us all! I'll bet the lives of your Sims are way more interesting than the lives of four skinny, intellectually challenged women! And yet I remain riveted to the show - sob!

Anonymous said...

I have not watched a single episode of Desperate Housewives. I don't know why, somehow apart from Friends, I do not seem to remember the timing of anything else on Star World. :-(

But now that you've given a fairly good idea about the lead characters, I want to watch it at least once. After all the whole world watches it. Including Mrs Bush. But then again, her taste...

A very cool cat said...

Ok, now I'm seriously depressed. My taste in soaps in similar to that of Mrs Bush? Ewww!
But yes, do watch an episode (Fridays at 10 pm) - would love to hear what you have to say!

Anonymous said...

Mrs Bush married Mr Bush... So, honestly, I don't think one should openly admit to sharing her tastes!!!

Unknown said...

I agree entirely with Payal - whoda thunk Laura Bush would wed a horse's derriere? Seriously, though, I watch Desperate Housewives - courtesy Pro, of course - and I'm pretty fascinated by the complete absence of meaning and ratiocination in American suburbia. I mean, 90 per cent of everything that happens in Desperate Housewives - or Disparate Hussifs, if you will, in the Queen's E - is a consequence of something to do with getting laid. Theodore Sturgeon's Law: "90 per cent of everything is crud." My law = Sturgeon's Law - and it holds true of DH. My point is: I can see why so many men might be watching DH (they are, for the most part, easy on the eye) - but why do so many women?

A very cool cat said...

Because, Kaju, 'most women live lives of quiet desperation', and, therefore, we can all identify with at least one, if not all, these women. Or so the producers of the show and the powers that be on Star World would have us believe. Bollocks, as Spike would say. It's probably because the guy who plays Mike Delfino's goodlooking in the scruffy sort of way that appeals to so many women!

Unknown said...

Mmm, I can understand - in a very, very dispassionate sort of manner. Like you said, Pro, why ain't any of the women a workin', heh? Did they all win the Great American Suburban Lottery and share it among themselves? (I know Gabrielle married the lottery, and got the gardener as a pneumatic bonus - but the rest of them are stone-dead losers, except for Lynette.) As for "plumber" Mike Delfino: don't you think the analogy is a bit, um, forced - like, in-their-unbotoxed faces? Plumber? Doh!

"And then one day you find ten years have got behind you
No one told you when to run, you missed the starting gun

"And you run and you run to catch up with the sun, but it’s sinking
And racing around to come up behind you again
The sun is the same in the relative way, but you’re older
Shorter of breath and one day closer to death

"Every year is getting shorter, never seem to find the time
Plans that either come to naught or half a page of scribbled lines
Hanging on in quiet desperation is the [American] way
The time is gone, the song is over, thought I’d something more to say"

Is this it? How come no one's made a serial about "desperate men"? There are enough of those gits walking around scratching away at their cheap family jewels with garden hoes.

Anonymous said...

I actually watched the entire last episode! I believe it was a sort of "what's happened so far", so I am up to date.

And it's true - EVERYTHING happens there... almost everything! Murder, robbery, infidelity, conspiracy... I'm so overwhelmed, I don't think I'll be watching any more TV this year!

A very cool cat said...

LOL - congratulations, Payal! Or should that be commiserations? By the way, you forgot to mention evil seductresses, wicked mothers-in-law, juvenile delinquency, sexual perversions ....

Anonymous said...

i think sex and the city wins hands down over desperate housewives. it is way better than watching despo housewives getting it on!! atleast here women are sluts without being apologetic about it!

A very cool cat said...

Thanks for your comment, Anindita. I'm afraid I haven't seen too much of Sex and the City, so can't really comment or compare with any authority. But you must be right - there can't be too many shows as defiantly dumb as Desperate Housewives - and I have heard that Sex and the City has some degree of intelligence!

Anonymous said...

Hi all
I found this site via a link form Sayantini's blog. I hope you dont mind me joining the discussion.
I think everyone's being a bit hard on Desparate Housewives. I mean neither that nor Sex and the City (the book is actually better) is really intellectually stimulating...they're feel good fluff...let's face it...and you'd think more guys would be watching...except that the guys in both shows are so wimpy...and they do get ripped apart...which for me anyway is the appeal of Sex and the City...but I prefer DH coz at least there's something happening on the periphery like murder or kidnapping or something equally bizarre...the girls in Sex and the City are so...blonde...and only the two blondes get any men and/or sex...I mean the last time saw the show the brunette married a guy who cant get it up..and the red head is too successful or not blonde enough to get a guy..I think it's a blonde conspiracy!
Another thing I don't get is if they're supposed to be so hip and happy being single why is every single episode (or do I always catch the non-intellectual bits?) about finding a guy and why do they care what society thinks and why are the voice over bits where Carrie says something (supposedly) profound, so very banal? As for stating the obvious...Mr Big?? D-uh!

A very cool cat said...

Hi! Thanks for the comment - and you're most welcome to join in the discussion on any of my blogs ... except, please do add your name so we know who you are!

I agree with you re Sex and the City - I haven't watched too many episodes, so can't comment too authoritatively on the subject, but the few I did watch left me thinking - is this what women's lives are supposed to be in the long run? Regardless of whether you're successful or not, the bulk of your time and energy has got to spent looking for a man. I think there's precious little to differentiate SATC from DH, except that in one the women stay home and in the other, they go out to work. I'm also beginning to think DH is actually the better of the two - not because of the half-baked murder/conspiracy angle, but because it at least has no pretensions - the women are all stay at home desperate housewives, period! (Except Lynette in the second season.)