Saturday, November 22, 2008

Delhi at the receiving end

Those Indians - especially Delhiites - infuriated at Aravind Adiga's heinous crime, that of painting a less than laudatory picture of India in general and Delhi in particular (a crime for which he has received so many threats that he has purpotedly placed himself under voluntary house arrest), should have watched the last couple of episodes of The Amazing Race, currently being aired on AXN Monday nights. Not because it would have cooled their righteous anger, but because it would inflamed them to the extent that Adiga, whose only crime as I see it is to have written an unreadable book, could have basked in the glory of the Booker prize money, even as the rest of us 'celebrated the death of the Booker', as K put it.

The Amazing Race, for people not in the know, is this very exciting programme where 10 couples (they don't have to going around or married; children and parents, friends, colleagues, etc., can all participate, as long as they're a twosome) set off for a race around the world - they fly to different countries, are given various tasks to perform, and the last team to come in every week gets eliminated. Three teams make to the finale, where the winning team receives a million dollars in prize money. This hugely successful show started an Asian franchise, The Amazing Race Asia, where participants come from Asian countries, and are on the whole far more intelligent, polite and charismatic than their American counterparts. They get only 100,000 USD, though, and they're pretty much confined to Asia and the UAE. So anyway, in the current season of The Amazing Race, six teams were asked to fly to India from Cambodia, where they had successfully completed the last leg of the race. They had to go to Delhi.

Now, the countries hosting the participants understandably look upon this opportunity as a tourism venture - the lovely parts of the city the teams are in are highlighted, so-called 'cultural' tasks set them - but not so in Delhi. The country's capital, which is a beautiful city for the most part, and boasts of historical ruins and momuments by the dozen, to say nothing of the lovely expanse of Lutyens' Delhi, unearthed the shadiest, dingiest parts of itself to send the AR teams to. And what did they do there? Paint autos the CNG green, go to the dhobi ghat and iron clothes, go to a gurudwara and give out water in dirty glasses, run through a field where people were playing mock Holi to retrieve their next clue, and in the quest get drenched in colour and mauled by grinning Kalkaji ruffians, try and spot little tags on electric lines in Nai Sarak, Daryaganj - all accompanied by random shots of monkeys, stray dogs, cows, and shanties (the last had divorcees Kelly and Christie holding their noses), and commentary that went like - 'Teams must now make their way through Delhi's crowded streets'; 'confusing roads'; 'dingy neighbourhoods', and so on. The Indian stereotype of dirt, crowds, ogling men, cows, snake charmers, poverty, beggars were held up for Western consumption, particularly for an audience that didn't have much knowledge of ... er... anything at all! For example, here's how conversations between frat boys Dan and Andy usually go - 'Where's Cambodia, man'? 'Man, India's big!'

The funny thing is, The Amazing Race Asia teams came to India too, to Cochin and Pune, where things were handled much better. They went to temples, did a rangoli, washed elephants, and went to the fishing bay in Cochin; went to Buddhist caves, the beautiful Shanivar Vada in Pune, and wandered around Pune's posh, glitzy neighbourhoods, finishing up at the pottery bazaar and crushing sugarcane to make juice that they subsequently sold. So why were the Indian crew, who were obviously part of deciding the tasks and arranging the practicalities, so singularly malicious when it came to Delhi? Clueboxes could have been set up in Janpath, or Connaught Circus, tasks devised in Hauz Khas Village, for example, but no. Don't get me wrong - I haven't suddenly discovered a love for the city after a year of being away. But I do hate that whole Indian stereotype of dirt and poverty and spirituality - and let's face it, there's far more to the country and it's people than that. So when TV programmes can get away with glorifying India's crowds and slums and poverty, why blame Aravind Adiga?

4 comments:

Poonam Tanmayo said...

I think what we Indians lack is a basic identification with our country. We are willing to showcase the dirt, the shit, the incompetence because deep inside we feel detached from it. Its not us, its the rest of the Indians that are dirty n incompetent. Come to our house, its super clean, even chappals are not allowed inside.
And so we clean our houses and throw the garbage on the road outside, where we even smell it rotting. Outside our house is not us.
But we dont realise that this attitude compromises our general dignity and health.
What is needed is an expansion of this boundary that separates us. From loving n taking pride in our house to loving our street to loving our area to loving our city to loving our country to loving the planet.
Loving it enough to keeping it clean n green, giving back, living in gratitude, having a future perspective.
The developed countries are no different in reality. Its just that their boundaries of love n pride are a little bigger, that's it. They love their country but have the same short-sighted attitude when they send their waste to places like India and we happily sort through the toxic gift. Yes, we are selling ourselves short. But so is the West.
In the end its one little planet and its lopsided health is going to boomerang eventually sooner or later on everyone.
I think I've gone off tangent but I personally dont care to showcase my lovely cultural artifacts and hide the dirt n clutter from outside eyes. Our dirt is very much our overpowering reality and over shadows all our wealth n beauty. Its a pity.

COMPOS MENTIS said...

western generalisations of 'poor india' abound. but it is sad that Indian authors,now, for some vested interest perhaps, play to that same western gallery. consider vikas swarup's 'slumdog millionaire'. at the same time, somehow, i cannot quite disagree with poonam either.

Unknown said...

I think that some gaggle of babus in North Block decided that ARA could only show those portions of Delhi that were NOT being dug up, wrenched out and generally beaten to death for the 2010 sports extravaganza - which means most of the pretty parts of the city. So what are we left with? Nai Sarak and dhobi ghat, obviously. The problem is that the babus probably didn't think it through: what do they know of postcolonial distress, anyway?

But I agree - they could have unearthed SOME good sights, of which there is no dearth, in Delhi. What we, and the world, got to see are tropes: India is full of steaming crap and autorickshaw rustbuckets and washerwomen wielding these ENORMOUS irons made in some medieval forge and buffaloes waddling down the fast lane and weeklong traffic jams.

Poo: I'd agree, too, with you that hiding the "dirt n clutter from outside eyes" would be disingenuous - but ARA showcasing only those parts of Delhi unfit for ANY eyes is like Amazing Race Europe (like THAT's going to happen soon) choosing to rampage through only the really dingy parts of London. ARA was a bit off.

A very cool cat said...

Thank you so much, all of you! :)

Poonam - Oh I agree with you, dirt and squalor is very much a part of our lives, and hiding it or disassociating oneself from it is akin to cleaning our houses while cluttering up the road outside - but what I was objecting to is the stereotype of India that was being showcased - that same stereotype that's been around for about 300 years now. Yet another Indian stereotype is that of the famed 'Indian culture and history', which our politicians fall back on when they can't give us good roads, clean water, or electricity, but want us to hold on to a sense of national pride nonetheless and and exercise our sovereign rights - so why not highlight some of that too, which they were at it?

Compos mentis - The movie Slumdog Millionaire's been getting very good reviews, though - I haven't read the book, and nor do I feel inclined through. I just spent a few bored hours reading Aravind Adiga, and seriously, it's enough to put one off reading altogether.

Kajal - Lutyen's Delhi and the residential parts of Hauz Khas or HK Village aren't being dug up - and speaking of 2010, the Delhi government's plan of airbrushing the city and bundling off people from, say, the Nizammudin slums to some secret hiding place would be quite redundant while shows like AR have Americans merrily trooping through shanties while the world watches!

Remember Terence and Sarah saying. 'India's going to challenge us the way we haven't been challenged so far' - and they were confronted with just what they think India is. That's what I mean, and that's what I hate. Though it was funny to see them all hollering for gloves while trying to lift those 'medieval' irons! :D