Tuesday, November 29, 2005


Delhi's disastrous roads


All of us in Delhi must've read about the pretty horrific accident filmmaker Pamela Rooks was involved in this morning. She's undergone brain surgery, the papers report, and is in a drug-induced coma at the moment. The newspapers, of course, didn't stop at just the accident: they went on to solemnly report the sorry state Delhi roads are in, and provided statistics for the past two years on just how many accidents there have been in Delhi every year, month, day; just how many are killed, and the vehicles they were driving at the time of death. What they forgot to mention, but what we all know, is that it's not so much Delhi roads as Delhi drivers who are the problem. What they also forgot to mention is a possible solution. Perhaps because there doesn't seem to be any.

Delhi roads, at any given point in time, are crammed with cars (enormous ones resembling trucks in some cases), buses (of various sizes), autorickshaws, scooters and bikes, bicycles, carts, jaywalkers, dogs and cows. Driving in this veritable menagerie is a feat in itself, and the situation is compounded by the fact that, first, everyone - cows, DTC bus drivers, yuppies in their big flashy cars, daredevil bikers and demented auto drivers - thinks they own pretty much every road in the city; and second, most people driving on Delhi roads should never have been given a licence to drive anywhere.

In my opinion, everything boils down to a lack of responsibility on the part of pretty nearly everyone in Delhi - the drivers, the pedestrians, the law and order situation, the way anyone can get a licence without knowing how to drive well enough. (Here's how my husband got his licence - he was told by this guy who was taking his test 'sau gaj aage chalaiye' ['Drive a 100 yards forward']; 'Ab reverse mein karke say gaj peche chalaiye' ['Now put the car in reverse and drive 100 yards back']. And that was it. The test was passed with flying colours, and the licence given. My husband might be responsible on the streets, but a lot of others who get their licences under similar circumstances are not.) The Alto that hit Pamela Rooks' Landcruiser was being driven by a drunk driver. The car had already careened out of control, hit the divider and flipped over by the time the Landcruiser came along. It landed on the biger car, and through no fault of hers, Pamela Rooks in in hospital in a coma.

Two points emerge from this incident. First, that it took a Pamela Rooks to make the story of yet another accident on Delhi roads newsworthy. Hundreds of people die in accidents through no fault of theirs every year, but their lives are never considered important enough to dwell upon. The parents of the young men who were travelling in the Alto (two of them died) are vehemently denying any possibility of their sons having been drunk. And in a bizarre twist (if the Hindustan Times is to be believed), an FIR has been filed against the driver of the Landcruiser. Why, pray, has that been done? What is he to blame for, other than being in the wrong place at the wrong time?

Second, what are the odds that people are going to forget about this incident in a couple of days' time and that irresponsible, rash and, yes, drunk drivers will continue to raise hell on Delhi streets? And when accidents happen, the guilty party will buy their way out of trouble with the help of money and muscle (remember the BMW case?). We as a nation - and possibly as a race - have become increasingly self-absorbed. Our social responsibility has become confined to just our immediate circle of loved ones. People in Delhi will continue to do as they please without a thought to the consequences their actions can have - they will drive with complete disregard where rules are concerned, they will take resort to physical violence at the merest hint of provocation, and they will not care less if they've had too much to drink before they get behind the wheel. And when lives are lost, they're usually of hapless people who, like Rooks, just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. As for the rest of us, we'll just shake our heads sorrowfully and get on with our lives.

20 comments:

Unknown said...

I'm afraid I wasn't such a responsible driver until I got half the bones broken in my body riding - or not - a mobike, and then realised that I would have a lifetime of payback and contemplation of the sins of the inadequately prepared. So, I do agree with you that if 95 per cent of Delhi's drivers were put to the test that's imperative in any Western nation, they would fail miserably. The capital's roads are the best in the country, but, given the propensity of drivers to drive point-and-shoot and edge through the traffic like worms carving holes and go hell for leather at traffic lights - a kind of insanity I've only ever seen equalled at Bangkok - it's but to be expected that innocents like Pamela Rooks would take the brunt of this megalopolitan madness and two of the three sodden idiots driving the guilty vehicle would croak. Their fault. If I were a dyed-in-the-wool conspiracy theorist, I'd say that the whole shebang was in cahoots with each other - the drivers, the road constructors, the law-and-order machinery, the government. Who gives a rat's arse as long as everyone has fun and makes money? As a sticker on a yuppie car said: "So many pedestrians, so little time."

A very cool cat said...

Unfortunately, unlike you, most of these crazy drivers who end up injuring others much more than hurting their own selves don't dwell too much on the prospect of a lifetime of payback and contemplation. I wish, to distort one of your favourite dreams, that we'd manage to colonise Mars - or any other planet - quickly and send all these idiots hurtling into outer space!

Unknown said...

Um, to undistort one of my favourite dreams: I think we should relocate to Mars or Chalcedony or even Arrakis and leave these deathwish dunces here in this country - this world - to wipe each other out. I'm glad I'm better built than most men - narcissistic as that might sound - which is why I get away with glaring and spraying the saliva of the yelling irate at drivers who drive like the road is their especial promenade and who get into scrapes with me. And that's every day. Maybe twice, sometimes thrice. And now, emulating Mumbai of two years ago, the government is thinking of opening all-nighter pubs. Talk of dropping a grenade down your own trousers.

Anonymous said...

It sometimes feels to be that what's wrong with Delhi's roads is pretty much symbolic of what's wrong with us as a society today. The indifference, insularity, selfishness, greed, irresponsibility... all rolled into one.

The worst part is, you're right, there doesn't seem to be anything that can be done about it!

(Oh, and guess what, I got my licence in almost exactly the same way: I was asked to drive forward about 10 yards, then asked the the hand signal for a left turn! That's it!)

A very cool cat said...

You know, I'm going to be learning to drive very soon (no, I don't know how to - yet), and while al lyour experiences make me think 'learning' and getting a licence will be a cakewalk, I'm not sure if I'll have the courage to join the maniacs on the streets.

And you're so right about Delhi roads mirroring the state of our society, Payal: something or the other happens every single day to undermine my faith in humanity some more. Read my next blog for one such example.

Anonymous said...

I never had the courage to join the maniacs on the road either. So we can quiver on the pavements together any time you want!

Unknown said...

Hey! Payal! If anyone's quivering on the pavements together with Pro, it's me. Damn! It's such a private act. Quivering. Together. On the pavements. Oh man, the number of accidents there'll be around. What're you trying to do? Get all those Mortuus Victus (The Unwilling Dead) on the roads to turn into jelly and mortuary material?

A very cool cat said...

There there. Lol. No one's taking away your quivering rights - eww, that sounds weird!

Anonymous said...

Kajal, I'm so sorry to have mortally offended your quivering sensibilities!

Unknown said...

Payal, my quivering rights remain hasta ahora intacto - so far intact: quivering in my boots, so to speak, everytime I hit the roads in our car. I quiver so much that I wish I were an arbalistmeister. The degree of my trepidation is incalculable - either that I'll turn into a wad of metal or that I'll be "road enraged" enough to have mangled a yuppie who has connections with a politician with an account at Cayman Islands or St Kitts or something. EOK - End of Kajal. Fourteen years in an Indian dungeon. So, I'm off, with Pro in tow, to Beta Lyrae. There, we off each other with bows and arrows.

A very cool cat said...

Um. Guys? Entertaining though your conversation might be, and however fond I might be of you both, this is MY BLOG. So please limit your comments to how great I am, and talk to each other on your own blogs!

Anonymous said...

You are The Great, Pro! The Great!

A very cool cat said...

Grrrrr ....

Anonymous said...

I told you - Grrrrrreat!

Anonymous said...

good post

The thinking thinker said...

Very true, nicely written.
The driving conditions are pathetic and everyone feels they own the road.

People are not worried about their own lives while driving leave alone other.

I had been driving abroad for some time. And, now when I am back to Delhi. I can't drive on the roads; its too scary.

People have no patience. They just don't want to wait at any cost.


Well, I leave that to lack of respect for anything but everything in delhi's culture.

A very cool cat said...

Hi - and thanks so much for visiting my blog! You're so right - Delhi has got to be among the leading cities in the world when it comes to lack of respect for just about everything. The aggressiveness is so tangible that you can almost reach out and touch it - well, actually you really can, since people are only too ready to bash each other up!

I've friends who have the same problem you do - after having driven abroad, they find themselves themselves unable to do so in Delhi. And yet, if people only followed the traffic rules, Delhi, with its wide roads and well-marked lanes, would be a dream to drive in.

The thinking thinker said...

Well, this is something one can go on and on and on about :-)

But we seriously need to do something about traffice rules in Delhi.

SAHIL NIRMAN said...

Hi.....its about a blog u wrote on the 29th day of november 2005...about an accident.which involved pamela rooks..

THIS IS ONE OF UR COMMENTS:-
Unfortunately, unlike you, most of these crazy drivers who end up injuring others much more than hurting their own selves don't dwell too much on the prospect of a lifetime of payback and contemplation. I wish, to distort one of your favourite dreams, that we'd manage to colonise Mars - or any other planet - quickly and send all these idiots hurtling into outer space!

IAM SAHIL NIRMAN....THE ONLY SURVIVOR IN THAT ACCIDENT....ITS SAD TO READ SUCH BLOGS WRITTEN WITHOUT ANY RESEARCH AND THE TRUTH....ACCORDING TO YOU..THE CRAZY DRIVER WHO ENDED UP HURTING P.ROOKS DYIED ON THE SPOT...HE WAS COMING FROM HIS SISTERS MARRIAGE...TOTALLY SOBER...THAT CAR WAS MINE...I LOST 2 FRDS IN THAT FUCKING ACCIDENT AND ACCORDING TO THE 1ST F.I.R ITS WAS PROVED THAT IT WAS P.ROOKS FAULT...NO HARD FEELINGS BUT BEFORE DOING SOMETHING YOU GOTTA KNOW THE FACTS.OR CHHOSE SOMETHINGS ELSE TO BE EXTRA COOL AND A RESPONSIBLE CITIZEN...THANK YOU

A very cool cat said...

Hello Sahil, and thank you for stopping by and leaving a comment. The problem is, I wrote this a day or two - I think - after the accident, and I was going by the media reports, that is, reports in the newspapers and that presented in the news channels. And this is exactly how they presented it. As there are several accidents that happen in exactly the same way, one cannot be faulted for taking reports at face value. It also doesn't help that the media, after covering an incident for a couple of days, forgets all about it when the next big thing comes along. As you can see, the other commentators had the same view as I did because they read the same reports.

I'm sorry for what happened to you, and I apologise if my blog hurt your sentiments. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. However, at the end of the day, I'm just another blogger. Perhaps you should also take this up with the media who presented a distorted view of the facts to begin with?